Stooksbury v. American National Property & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a 25% bad faith penalty after concluding the defendant had substantial legal grounds supporting its position that the plaintiffs’ insurance coverage had been cancelled prior to the date of loss
• reversing a 25% bad faith penalty after concluding the defendant had substantial legal grounds supporting its position that the plaintiffs' insurance coverage had been cancelled prior to the date of loss
• reversing a 25% bad faith penalty after concluding the defendant had substantial legal grounds supporting its position that the plaintiffs’ insurance coverage had been cancelled prior to the date of loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).