Stonington Insurance Co. v. William

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading UM coverage into policy where insured had not rejected limits in writing and finding insured was “entitled to UM 7 “Limitations on coverage,” provides, in relevant part: (c
• court engaged in a five-factor analysis to determine which state had the most significant relationship to the parties and the transaction, considering: (a) the place of contracting; (b) the place of negotiation of the contract; (c) the place of performance; (d
• court engaged in a five-factor analysis to determine which state had the most significant relationship to the parties and the transaction, considering: (a) the place of contracting; (b) the place of negotiation of the contract; (c) the place of performance; (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).