· 6/20/1996
Stoner v. Williams
Citations
- 46 Cal. App. 4th 986
- 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 243
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4608
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 7329
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the existence of multiple legal theories or alternative fraudulent acts did not alter the conclusion that there remained only a single cause of action
- “In civil cases, only three-fourths of jurors need agree on a verdict in California.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.