Stoner v. Ellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining the class as indecent solicitation of a child without refining any further where district court never determined specific facts related to the offense
• stating defendant's failure to ensure adequate findings and conclusions on Freeman challenge foreclosed this court's review
• defendant's failure to ensure the district court made adequate findings and conclusions on Freeman challenge foreclosed this court's review
• lifetime postrelease supervision for indecent solicitation with a child \serves the valid penological objectives of deterring such conduct and in incapacitating and rehabilitating the offender\
• lifetime postrelease supervision for indecent liberties with a child \serves the valid penological objectives of deterring such conduct and in incapacitating and rehabilitating the offender\
• \[T]he district court does not have discretion to ignore the lifetime postrelease supervision requirement of K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 22-3717[d][1][G].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).