Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the third Rule 24(a)(2) factor “may be satisfied if, for example, a determination of the action in the applicants’ absence will have a significant stare decisis effect on their claims, or if the applicants’ rights may be affected by a proposed remedy”
• finding a motion filed the day after the complaint to be timely, without question
• \The Supreme Court has adopted a framework of forum analysis to assess whether a government entity must permit speech or expressive activity on its property.\
• reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions allowed in nonpublic forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).