Stone & Webster Constr., Inc. v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that worker's compensating for pain in his right knee by dependence upon his left knee was insufficient to remove the right-knee injury from the schedule; overruling Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc. v. Ruggs , 891 So.2d 869 (Ala.Civ.App. 2004
• noting that the schedule contains *Page 104 an entry for the loss of both legs and holding that when the effects of an injury to the right knee extended to the left knee, the claim was governed by the schedule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).