Skip to main content

Stone v. Wall

Citations

  • 734 So. 2d 1038
  • 1999 WL 424384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding parent and natural guardian of minor child had valid tortious interference with custodial parent-child relationship claim against third-party abductors
  • noting that cause of action “requires physical absence of child from home”
  • “The elements of the cause of action include that the plaintiff had superior custody rights to the child and that the defendant intentionally interfered with those rights.”
  • court reasoning that \outdated common law principles based on the view that children are nothing more than the economic assets of their parents\ should be replaced with a tort that is \not predicated on loss of services but on the sanctity of the parent-child relationship\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.