Skip to main content
· 10/15/1843

Stone v. Varney

Citations

  • 48 Mass. 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Supreme Court’s analytical framework in Don’t Waste Oregon10 to reject as implausible DHS’s interpretation of own rule due to inconsistency with text of rule as understood in its con- text

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dewey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.