Stone v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The two cases, although consolidated, were separate and distinct. Defendant had exercised all the rights and privi- leges he was entitled to in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2011-10-14· cited 705×
• Hall v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 2018-03-27· cited 468×
• Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of Commerce
  D.C. Circuit· 1954-01-07· cited 60×
• Rumely v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1923-07-27· cited 56×
• Adler v. Seaman
  Eighth Circuit· 1920-05-11· cited 38×
• Owens v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1904-05-23· cited 25×
• Betts v. United States
  First Circuit· 1904-08-25· cited 22×
• United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
  District of Columbia· 1943-08-10· cited 16×
• Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. C. v. A. B. C. Fireproof Warehouse Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1936-03-03· cited 9×
• First National Bank v. Lewinson
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1904-03-03· cited 8×
• Lockhart v. Leeds
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1904-03-03· cited 7×
• United States v. Denver & R. G. R.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado· 1911-08-29· cited 4×
• Bacheldor v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1897-12-13· cited 4×
• United States v. Jaedicke
  D. Kansas· 1896-03-30· cited 3×
• Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of Louisville
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1898-02-15· cited 3×
• United States v. St. Anthony R.
  Ninth Circuit· 1902-03-03· cited 2×
• United States v. Bacheldor
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1897-03-01