Stone v. State
Citations
- 71 Fla. 514
- 71 So. 634
Syllabus
<p>1. The State constitution does not grant particular legislative powers, but contains specific limitations of the general lawmaking power of the legislature.</p> <p>2. The duties of a State Attorney are statutes; and while . under the constitution there must be “a State Attorney in each Judicial Circuit,” the constitution does not expressly or impliedly require the duties “prescribed by law” for such officer to be confined to the Judicial Circuit in which he is appointed.</p> <p>3. Testimony of a witness that she was present when a statement was made is not hearsay.</p> <p>4. The age of a child may be testified to as a matter of family history.</p> <p>5. It is not error to refuse a requested charge that is in substance sufficiently covered by a charge given.</p> <p>6. A charge on the law applicable to facts of a case is not a charge on the facts.</p> <p>7. Where charges are endorsed by the judge as refused because covered by other charges given, it is not error to permit them to be taken by the jury to the jury room with the charges given, where no harm reasonably could have resulted therefrom.</p> <p>8. Where there is ample evidence to sustain the verdict, and there is nothing to indicate that the jury were not governed by the evidence, and no material or harmful errors of law or procedure appear, the judgment will be affirmed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting a similar provision in a prior version of the constitution
- interpreting a similar provision in a prior version of the constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cockrell, Ellis, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chiles v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-07-02· cited 22×
- Kirk v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-04-15· cited 15×
- Yanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-08· cited 9×
- ADVISORY OPINION TO the ATTORNEY GENERAL Re RIGHTS OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY CHOICE. Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Rights of Electricity Consumers Regarding Solar Energy Choice (FIS)Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-03-31· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. Christian v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-11-05· cited 5×
- State of Fla. Ex Rel. Johnson v. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida· 1926-07-05· cited 1×
- Mack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-24· cited 1×
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 1984-01-26
- Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: All Voters Vote in Primary Elections for State Legislature, Governor, and CabinetSupreme Court of Florida· 2020-03-19
- Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: All Voters Vote in Primary Elections for State Legislature, Governor, and CabinetSupreme Court of Florida· 2020-03-25
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Florida· 1868-07-01· cited 72×
- Price v. McLeodSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-03-04· cited 70×
- City of Jacksonville v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-03-10· cited 67×
- Chapman v. ReddickSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-01-15· cited 27×
- McDuffee v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.