Skip to main content

Stone v. State

Citations

  • 919 S.W.2d 424
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39
  • 1996 WL 149164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that article 1.15 “applies whether the stipulation relates to what a witness would testify to or to the truth of the allegations in the indictment.”
  • noting that a no contest plea has the same legal effect as a guilty plea
  • holding Court of Criminal Appeals has routinely found stipulation as to what witnesses would testify if present at trial is sufficient to support conviction in contest of Article 1.15
  • no requirement for a defendant pleading no contest to judicially confess or stipulate to state witness testimony
  • no requirement for a defendant pleading no contest to judicially confess or stipulate to state witness testimony
  • no contest plea has the same legal effect as a guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.