District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/1/2005
Stone v. State
Citations
- 899 So. 2d 421
- 2005 WL 735286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it cannot be assumed that the jury disregarded the erroneous oral instruction even though it was provided with a correct copy of written instructions
- improper oral instruction on the elements of burglary constituted fundamental error even though a correct written copy of the instructions was furnished to the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pena v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 78×
- State v. SykesSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-07· cited 46×
- Viveros v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-01· cited 34×
- Harrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 12×
- Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-02· cited 12×
- Valentine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-05· cited 10×
- Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-11· cited 6×
- Giangrasso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 5×
- Bernhardt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.