Skip to main content

Stone v. State

Citations

  • 899 So. 2d 421
  • 2005 WL 735286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it cannot be assumed that the jury disregarded the erroneous oral instruction even though it was provided with a correct copy of written instructions
  • improper oral instruction on the elements of burglary constituted fundamental error even though a correct written copy of the instructions was furnished to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.