Stone v. Shelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the commonality element is met where the common legal question is whether the letter violates the FDCPA and FCCPA
• stating “[t]he essential factual link between all prospective class members is the letters sent by defendants”
• determining that the plaintiff met the requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) where the essential factual link between all of the prospective class members was the letters sent by the defendants and the basis for the plaintiffs’ claim was the language and content of the letters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).