Skip to main content
· 11/22/1995

Stone v. Rosenthal

Citations

  • 665 So. 2d 276
  • 1995 WL 689540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that purpose of 90-day notice period in section 766.106(4) \is to give a prospective defendant an opportunity to investigate the claim and avoid litigation by settling it\
  • rejecting assertion that family had duty to act on behalf of emancipated, comatose plaintiff and remanding for consideration of whether a guardian was appointed and charged with requisite knowledge of potential malpractice claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.