Stone v. New York Public Library

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because it is rare to have direct proof of intent to hinder, delay or defraud, it is proper to infer intent from circumstantial evidence.”
• “Because it is rare to have direct proof of intent to hinder, delay or defraud, it is proper to infer intent from circumstantial evidence.”
• “Because it is rare to have direct proof of intent to hinder, delay or defraud, it is proper to infer intent from circumstantial evidence.”
• “If one can ‘destroy’ a reputation, then it stands to reason that one can destroy the value of a membership interest in an LLC.”
• \Plaintiffs' alter ego claim is allowed by state law.\
• “[T]here is no de minimis exception in Section 727(a)(2)(A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).