Stone v. New York City Department of Homeless Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff's beneficial interest in a trust was too speculative to form a sufficient basis for standing
• cautioning against “conflat[ing] standing with the rule of law prohibiting a pro se litigant from pursuing claims on another’s behalf” and holding that “a trustee cannot proceed pro se on behalf of a trust”
• trustee may not proceed pro se to represent trusts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).