Stone v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court has “discretion to determine the 'necessity' of the expert testimony”
• holding that the trial court has “discretion to determine the ‘necessity’ of the expert testimony”
• holding that the trial court has “discretion to determine the ‘necessity’ of the expert testimony”
• “When a fact at issue is so technical or complex that no fact finder could resolve without expert testimony, expert testimony is ‘necessary’ and, therefore required.”
• “When a fact at issue is so technical or complex that no fact finder could resolve without expert testimony, expert testimony is ‘necessary’ and, therefore required.”
• “A person has a property right in a license that requires sufficient procedural due process before the license can be ‘impaired, suspended, or revoked.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).