Stone v. Finnerty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Article I, section 10, focuses on substantial remedies for types of legal injuries rather than on the types of physical, mental or other harm suffered” (emphasis added)
• alluding, in dicta, to the fact that both physical and mental injuries are compensable under workers’ compensation law
• battery claim against third-party public body precluded by ORS 30.265(3)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).