· 9/28/1998
Stone v. Department of Human Rights
Citations
- 700 N.E.2d 1105
- 299 Ill. App. 3d 306
- 233 Ill. Dec. 397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- clarifying that in determining whether there was a lack of substantial evidence so as to permit dismissal of a discrimination charge the Department of Human Rights must look to all three prongs of the test
- “Substantial evidence means more than a mere scintilla but less than a preponderance of the evidence. [Citations.] Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knecht, Cook, Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.