Stone v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in UIFSA case, court states that “[s]ubject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel”
• “[UIFSA petitioner] resides in the issuing state, and all of the parties have not filed consents here. Alabama had no jurisdiction to modify the 1997 order. . . . Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel.”
• “Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).