Skip to main content
· 5/3/1983

Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers South, Inc.

Citations

  • 430 So. 2d 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an affidavit was insufficient as containing “mere conclusions” because the affidavit did not indicate the source of the affiant’s knowledge
  • upholding summary judgment where the non-movant’s affidavit “contain[ed] mere conclusions relating to her interpretation of [a] contract” and did not “indicate[] the source of her information”
  • employee of lessee under commercial lease granting lessee exclusive use of premises could not recover from landlord for injuries resulting from fall caused by allegedly defective carpeting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Baskin and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.