Skip to main content
· 10/19/1992

Stoltz Management Co. v. Consumer Affairs Board

Citations

  • 616 A.2d 1205
  • 1992 Del. LEXIS 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • charging a separate non-refundable fee in addition to rent is not permissible under Section 5501(c)
  • landlord’s lease provision which required a redecorating fee violated the Landlord- tenant code as defendant was charging for normal wear and tear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horsey, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.