· 10/19/1992
Stoltz Management Co. v. Consumer Affairs Board
Citations
- 616 A.2d 1205
- 1992 Del. LEXIS 403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- charging a separate non-refundable fee in addition to rent is not permissible under Section 5501(c)
- landlord’s lease provision which required a redecorating fee violated the Landlord- tenant code as defendant was charging for normal wear and tear
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.