Stoltmann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding improper instruction was harmless error where defendant admitted to officer that she had been driving and was intoxicated
• concluding improper instruction was harmless error where defendant admitted to officer that she had been driving and was intoxicated
• “a witness’s prior inconsistent unsworn statement is not admissible as substantive evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).