Stoller v. Pure Fishing Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for a timely appeal.
• A Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for a timely appeal.
• “A Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for appeal … .”
• district court’s denial of Rule 60(b) motion was not an abuse of discretion where moving party offered only arguments on the merits; “[a] Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for appeal, and thus [appellant]’s attempt to use it as such was appropriately rejected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).