Stoll v. Principi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when reviewing motion to dismiss, court may, “for the sake of completeness,” supplement facts gleaned from the complaint with “undisputed facts”
• “The lodging of either a formal appeal with the Board or a formal complaint with the agency demarcates the point of no return. From that point forward, the complainant must exhaust her claim in the chosen forum.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).