Skip to main content
· 3/16/2000

Stolhandske v. Stern

Citations

  • 14 S.W.3d 810
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1735
  • 2000 WL 280417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “had the legislature intended to make all orders vacating arbitration awards immediately appealable, it could have easily done so. In fact, the Federal Arbitration Act so provides.”
  • construing section 171.098(a)(5) and concluding that “this Court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order that vacates an arbitration award and orders a new arbitration”
  • construing section 171.098(a)(5) and concluding that \this Court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order that vacates an arbitration award and orders a new arbitration\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael H. Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.