Skip to main content
· 11/16/1988

Stokes v. Commissioner of Correction

Citations

  • 530 N.E.2d 801
  • 26 Mass. App. Ct. 585
  • 1988 Mass. App. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stated reasons of “ ‘report and testimony’ ” deemed sufficient explanation under the regulations and Wolff
  • “While it may be implicit in the [disciplinary] board’s disposition, it is impossible to tell from the face of the decision in any particular instance whether the board believed all, some, or none [of] the contents of the officer’s report”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner, Cutter, Fine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.