Stokes v. Association of Independent Taxi Operators, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a split of authority on the continued viability of the doctrine, but stating that any change in the rule must come from the General Assembly
• declining to change the interspousal immunity rule and noting that change, if any, would be left to Legislature
• declining to alter the common law rule governing interspousal immunity in tort actions
• declining to alter the common law rule governing interspousal immunity in tort actions
• suit against husband’s employer for injuries wife suffered while a paying passenger in taxicab driven by her husband
• “[I]f the rule is to be changed, the Legislature will have to do it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).