Skip to main content
· 1/11/1929

Stokem v. Erie R. Co.

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 102
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the nature of the PPS term required under ORS 144.103
  • reviewing imposition of post-prison supervision as a part of the sentence
  • reviewing imposition of post-prison supervision as a part of the sentence
  • explaining the nature of the PPS term required under ORS 144.103
  • sentence imposing a 240-month post-prison supervision term “per 144.103” held not to exceed the maximum statutory indeterminate sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buffington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.