Skip to main content
· 8/4/2009

Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.

Citations

  • 646 F. Supp. 2d 510
  • 95 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1108
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67673
  • 2009 WL 2390245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying preliminary injunction on the basis of unclean hands where plaintiff accused its competitor-defendant of advertising the advantages of its sports drink when plaintiff was doing the same
  • “[plaintiff] cannot, having jumped on the bandwagon of [advertising the benefits of] calcium and magnesium first, now jump off and claim that [defendant] must get off too. Therefore, . . . [plaintiff's] own unclean hands also preclude . . . equitable relief. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.