Skip to main content
· 2/28/1921

Stoehr v. Wallace

Citations

  • 255 U.S. 239
  • 41 S. Ct. 293
  • 65 L. Ed. 604
  • 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1817

Syllabus

<p>1. The Trading With the Enemy Act, originally and as amended, is strictly a war measure, and finds its sanction in the provision empowering Congress “to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning-captures on land and water.” Const. Art. I, § 8, cl. 11. P. 241.</p> <p>2. Under § 7c of the act, as qualified'by § 5, the power vested in the President to determine enemy ownership, precedent to a seizure of property, may be delegated by him to the Alien Property Custodian, whose determination then becomes in effect the act of the President.' •P. 244.</p> <p>3. The provision made for ex parte executive seizure, without prior judicial determination of enemy ownership, does not violate the rights of the owner, if a citizen, under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, since, ample provision is also made whereby any claimant who is neither an enemy nor an ally of an enemy may establish his right in a court of equity and compel a return of the property if wrongly sequestered. P. 245.</p> <p>4. A transfer of shares upon the books of the corporation to the name of the Custodian is a proper incident to their effective seizure by him. ÍP. 246.</p> <p>5. A contract between a German corporation and a New York corporation, made in anticipation of this country’s entry into the World War, whereby certain corporate shares in another domestic corporation, owned by the German corporation, were in purport sold to the New York corporation and were transferred to the latter on the books of the third company, not as a genuine business trans- . ■ action but as a mere cover to avoid inconveniences of a state of war and with no intent to change the beneficial' ownership,AeZcZ not to have passed any interest entitling the New York corporation, or a stockholder asserting its rights, to demand release of such shares from seizure by the Alien Property Custodian. Pp. 246-251.</p> <p>6. The provisions of the Treaty with Prussia of July 11,1799, Arts. 23, 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • corporate stock supposed to belong to the enemy
  • upholding government authority to seize enemy property
  • upholding government authority to seize enemy property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Devanter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.