Stodghill v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a medical expert need not use the exact magic words “reasonable medical probability”
• when testifying about cause, medical expert’s testimony is sufficient if substance of what he says conveys reasonable medical probability
• a medical expert need not use the exact magic words “reasonable medical probability” if the testimony is sufficient to show this is the substance of what the expert is saying
• “The medical –7– expert need not use the exact magic words ‘reasonable medical probability,’ but the testimony is sufficient if the circumstances show that this is the substance of what the expert is saying.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).