Stoddart v. Pocatello School District 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that location of injury off school grounds was not dispositive of duty question where the plaintiffs argued that proper investigation on school grounds would have prevented student’s death
• declining to extend a school district’s duty to require it “take reasonable steps to prevent a violent criminal act against a student by a fellow student away from school grounds and not in connection with a school-sponsored activity”
• raising argument that proper investigation during school hours would have prevented after-hours death, but rejecting care standard requiring “indefinite monitoring” and finding no duty as result of lack of foreseeability of violent student criminal activity
• raising argument that proper investigation during school hours would have prevented after-hours death, but rejecting care standard requiring “indefinite monitoring” and finding no duty as result of lack of foreseeability of violent student criminal activity
• declining to extend a school district's duty to require it \take reasonable steps to prevent a violent criminal act against a student by a fellow student away from school grounds and not in connection with a school-sponsored activity\
• declining to extend a school district's duty to require it \take reasonable steps to prevent a violent criminal act against a student by a fellow student away from school grounds and not in connection with a school-sponsored activity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).