Wyoming Supreme Court· 10/17/1985
Stoddard v. State
Citations
- 707 P.2d 176
- 1985 Wyo. LEXIS 580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We do not believe that it is of any consequence that the trial court did not use some magic words to say affirmatively that it considered probation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-05-22· cited 260×
- Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-10-19· cited 81×
- Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1979-03-28· cited 53×
- Ventling v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 21×
- Beaulieu v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 18×
- Kenney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-02-01· cited 13×
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-03-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.