Stoddard v. Public Utilities Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the agency did not arbitrarily or capriciously deny an L-1A petition where the employee’s job descriptions were “overly broad and generic and did not provide sufficient insight into the actual nature of [the employee’s] role within the organization”
• USCIS’ “reliance on [an L-1 petition’s] inconsistencies in its decision-making was not arbitrary and capricious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).