Stoddard v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiffs constitutional claim because “[w]holly absent from the Plaintiffs complaint is any allegation of a pattern, practice, policy or custom of the District of Columbia, the application of which caused [the alleged constitutional] violation”
• dismissing the plaintiff’s constitutional claim because “[w]holly absent from the Plaintiff’s complaint is any allegation of a pattern, practice, policy or custom of the District of Columbia, the application of which caused [the alleged constitutional] violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).