Skip to main content
· 4/27/2006

Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review Panel

Citations

  • 135 P.3d 220
  • 122 Nev. 385
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 35
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a party has standing where a statute confers a right upon that party
  • examining the Lujan approach, examining the history of state- crafted standing, and ultimately rejecting the Lujan approach under Nevada law
  • “State courts need not 19 become enmeshed in the federal complexities and technicalities involving standing and are free to reject 20 procedural frustrations in favor of just and expeditious determination on the ultimate merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Douglas, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.