Stockman's Water Co., LLC v. Vaca Partners, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rule 54(b) certification insufficient where district “court simply incorporated by reference [party’s] arguments and conclusions”
• discerning no jurisdiction where the order at issue “fail[ed] to comport with Rule 54(b)’s requirement that a final judgment be entered only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay”
• “[C]ourts entering a Rule 54(b) certification should ‘clearly articulate their reasons and make careful statements based on the record supporting their determination of “finality” and “no just reason for delay” so that we [can] review a 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).