Skip to main content
· 5/23/1966

Stockman v. Marks Polarized Corp.

Citations

  • 25 A.D.2d 883
  • 270 N.Y.S.2d 223
  • 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • duty of care owed to a plaintiff must be evaluated by considering the risks the plaintiff assumed and how those assumed risks qualified the defendants’ duty to him
  • duty of care owed to a plaintiff -24- No. 2--05--1218 must be evaluated by considering the risks the plaintiff assumed and how those assumed risks qualified the defendants' duty to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beldoek, Benjamin, Brennan, Hopkins, Ughetta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.