Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/6/2017

Stocker v. Stocker

Citations

2017 Ohio 8434

Syllabus

The trial court's value of the marital home and the parties' business in the equitable division of property was not against the manifest weight of evidence or an abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding not to apply the $150,000 combined income level cap to the child support order.

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Freytag v. Freytag
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-24· cited 2×
Lewis v. Lewis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-21

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
Cherry v. Cherry
Ohio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 872×
Berish v. Berish
Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 459×
Pauly v. Pauly
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 367×
Hoyt v. Hoyt
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 287×
Tennant v. Martin-Auer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-07-26· cited 65×
Huelskamp v. Huelskamp
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-28· cited 44×
Clark v. Clark
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-21· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.