Stocke v. Shuffle Master, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that repeated instances of “improper recognition of revenues before they were earned ... suggest a conscious decision to improperly recognize revenue”
• finding scienter adequately pleaded where “the mistakes allowed the Company’s reported earnings to achieve consensus estimates”
• “[A Rule] 10b5-1 trading plan does not provide an absolute defense to a 15 claim of insider trading. Rather, it requires an additional factual finding of good faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).