Skip to main content
· 10/18/1978

Stockburger v. Robinson

Citations

  • 270 N.W.2d 453
  • 1978 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the presence or absence of an objection may figure into our analysis of the alleged misconduct, citing State v. King, 288 Kan. 333, 349, 204 P.3d 585 [2009]
  • addressing merits where defendant referenced, without specifically objecting, pretrial objection prior to the evidence being introduced
  • reviewing the method employed in presenting admissible evidence from a prior hearing that was subject to cross-examination for abuse of judicial discretion
  • noting record made clear trial judge understood the legal basis for an objection when counsel simply referred to it as an 18 \'earlier objection'\ or a \'prior objection'\
  • “An order resulting from a motion in limine is a temporary protective order that is subject to change during the trial.”
  • \An order resulting from a motion in limine is a temporary protective order that is subject to change during the trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Legrand, Rees, Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.