STK Enterprises, Inc. v. Crusader Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, even though the underlying case was settled before the insured sought indemnification from the insurer, that “[t]he duty to indemnify, unlike the duty to defend, does not depend on the allegations of the complaint; rather, that duty arises from the facts proved at trial”
• “A ‘wrongful eviction’ within the context of plaintiffs policy connotes an improper ouster from a possesso-ry interest in property.”
• bar and restaurant’s personal injury coverage for wrongful eviction did not cover bar’s alleged refusal to admit prospective black patrons; patrons had no possessory interest in bar and restaurant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).