Stitz v. City of Eureka Springs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment for the defendant and 10 holding that the plaintiff’s inconsistent practices failed to create a genuine issue of fact as 11 to sincerity of belief
• “[W]e do not believe that under the GERA, the district court is the court that can exercise judicial review of an EEOC determination. Rather, we believe that the court of appeals has such jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).