Stirling v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• also stating that application of the herbicide applied by means other than a helicopter and on a more selective basis might have been permitted by the language
• although the easement included an express right ‘to cut and trim trees and shrubbery,” this had to be done ‘in a reasonable manner, with due regard to the rights of all parties”; indiscriminate chemical spraying was not reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mattson v. Montana Power Co.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 43×
• Duresa v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-30· cited 37×
• Kell v. Appalachian Power Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 17×
• Larew v. Monongahela Power Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-05-30· cited 6×
• Weigand v. Asplundh Tree Experts
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-03-05· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Todd v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1969-02-14· cited 24×
• Ayala v. Bailey Electric Company, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1975-11-14· cited 17×
• Carimi v. Saia
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1974-10-09· cited 16×
• Villa v. Bailey Electric Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-11-14· cited 4×
• Todd v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-05-09· cited 3×