Stinson v. Trimas Fasteners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when there are competing opinions of value, the Indiana Board must determine which is more probative
• providing that Indiana’s property tax system taxes the value of real property, not intangible business value, investment value, or the value of contractual rights
• explaining that the Indiana Board is the finder of fact and consequently responsible for weighing evidence and judging witness credibility
• explaining that the Court cannot reweigh evidence on appeal absent a showing that the Indiana Board abused its discretion
• providing that the Court may not reweigh the evidence absent an abuse of discretion
• stating that an appraisal, is an appraiser’s opinion, not an exact science

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).