Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/21/2003
Stinson v. State
Citations
- 797 N.E.2d 352
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1970
- 2003 WL 22390017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Our supreme court has repeatedly held that while the dismissal and refiling of the same charges does not reset the one-year period, it does toll the clock for the actual days between dismissal and refiling (or arrest).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedlander, Riley, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Meredith Coleman v. Nyal Frantz, Sheriff of Wells County, IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1985-01-30· cited 126×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- Burdine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-12-02· cited 68×
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-04-12· cited 19×
- Hornaday v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-22· cited 14×
- Bentley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-04-19· cited 10×
- Brettin v. GrandstaffIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.