Stinson v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the law of the case rule applied, despite a change in evidentiary posture, where the holding at issue concerned a legal question not affected by the new evidence
• adverse possession is “usu- ally a mixed question of law and fact” where “jury decides whether the claimant has presented sufficient evidence to establish the elements of adverse posses- sion”
• trial court correctly denied appellant’s motion to add individuals as indispensable parties under OCGA § 9-11-19, where the individuals had no legal interest in the disputed property at the time appellants sought to add them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).