Stinson v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if consequences of criminal act are foreseeable by a reasonable person, as opposed to the insured, coverage for injury barred
• if consequences of criminal act are foreseeable by a reasonable person, as opposed to the insured, coverage for injury barred
• jury issue created as to whether insured’s conduct fit objective “reasonable person” standard
• “The common understanding of the words ‘which may reasonably be expected to result from the intentional or criminal acts of an insured person’ clearly creates a universal objective standard.”
• “The common understanding of the words ‘which may reasonably be expected to result from the intentional or criminal acts of an insured person’ clearly creates a universal objective standard.”
• “We do not cover any bodily injury or property damage which may reasonably be expected to result from the intentional or criminal acts of an insured person or which are in fact intended by an insured person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).