Skip to main content
· 8/1/2003

Stinnett v. Safeway, Inc.

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 1213
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15495
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,503
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 672
  • 2003 WL 21774008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that what constitutes \adverse employment action\ is to be liberally defined
  • “Actions presenting nothing beyond . . . ‘alteration of responsibilities’ . . . do not constitute adverse employment action.”
  • “Colorado has adopted the same standards applicable to Title VII cases when considering claims brought under [CADA].”
  • “Colorado has adopted the same standards applicable to Title VII cases when considering claims brought under the [CADA].”
  • “Generally, a voluntary, unconditional guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings.”
  • “Generally, a voluntary, unconditional guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Lucero, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.